- Country or region
- India
- United States
- Trade topics
- Dispute settlement
- Context
- WTO - EU as third party
Summary of the case
India considers that the US 'Amended Bond Directive' and the enhanced bond requirement imposed by the US on imports of shrimp from India are inconsistent with a number of ADA, SCM and GATT provisions. Relevant WTO provision: Articles 1, 7.1, 7.2, 7.4, 7.5, 9.2, 9.3, 9.3.1, 18.1 and 18.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement; Articles I, II, III, VI:2, VI:3 (including Note 1 Ad paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article VI), X, XI and XIII of the GATT 1994; Articles 10, 17.4, 17.5, 19.3, 19.4, 32.1 and 32.5 of the SCM Agreement StatusThe Panel report was circulated on 29 February 2008 and it has been appealed by both India and the United States
DocumentsEU submissions and other related documents |